- UTRGV Recognized By ED As Among Schools ‘Doing The Most To Lift Students Up’
- Halloween is a Tradition That Dates Back Many Years
- Esteban Cabrera – December 26, 1945 – October 11, 2024
- Ready for District
- Harlingen Opens First Pump Track in South Texas
- ACE Flag Football
- La Feria ISD Hires Chief of Police for District
- Three Ways To Protect Migratory Birds This Fall
- Goodwill and the RGV Vipers Team Up for a Skills Camp
- Santa Rosa ISD Offers Law Enforcement Cadet Program
Internet Advocates Urge Congress to Call Off “Sneak Attack”
- Updated: July 3, 2015
by Eric Galatas/TNS
AUSTIN, Texas – More than 60 civil rights and public-interest groups sent a letter urging Congress to protect the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) decision to keep the Internet open.
The coalition is protesting a rider, attached to a must-pass government funding package, that would take away money the FCC needs to enforce net neutrality rules. Timothy Karr, senior director of strategy with the nonprofit Free Press, says the provisions are buried inside a spending bill 150 pages long.
“This is one of the more sneaky ways to do it,” he says. “Slip a couple lines of language into a budget appropriations bill.”
Advocates claim that by eliminating the FCC’s ability to protect net neutrality, the appropriations bill would have a chilling effect on First Amendment rights and the economy. The American Library Association, National Hispanic Media Coalition, American Civil Liberties Union and Electronic Frontier Foundation are among the groups that signed on to the letter.
In February, the FCC responded to nearly four million public comments with a decision to protect the fundamental openness of the Internet – no “fast lanes” for corporations, and no “slow lanes” for average citizens. Karr says since the ruling, an entrenched phone and cable lobby has worked to punish the FCC for protecting the public’s interest in the courts and now in Congress.
“The public, on the issue of net neutrality, has been overwhelmingly in favor of open Internet protections,” he says. “So we’re seeing the backlash of that decision.”
Karr adds that the funding package is inching closer to a vote before the full House, but there’s still time for members to remove the provisions.